Getty Images | FAYEZ NURELDINE

Saudi Arabia Has An App That Tracks Women And Human Rights Groups Want It Gone

Many of us allow Google or Apple to track us without giving it a second thought — after all, it can make life easier. Most importantly, you're consenting. But when it's someone else who chooses to track your whereabouts, things move from convenient to creepy. One such app, created by the Saudi government, is raising all kinds of red flags.

Practically all smart devices have GPS functionality.

Unsplash | rawpixel

It wasn't long ago that this seemed incredibly futuristic, but now, we take it for granted that our phone knows exactly where we are at all times, thanks to its communications with a satellite in space.

This brings us to Saudi Arabia...

Wikipedia | Ammar shaker

An oil-rich kingdom on the Arabian Peninsula, Saudi Arabia's track record regarding human rights is, shall we say, not particularly good. Western allies tend to turn a blind eye towards these abuses.

Women's rights are limited.

Wikipedia | Jpatokal

The United Nations ranked Saudi Arabia 141st out of 144 countries for gender parity. While there have been incremental changes — women were recently granted the right to drive, for instance — it's a society that largely believes in male guardianship over women.

This app isn't helping things.

Google Play Store

The app, called Absher, translates to "yes, sir". It's no coincidence that it's so popular in Saudi Arabia, since it was created by a government agency — the Ministry of Interior's National Information Center.

It's basically a wife-tracker.

Wikipedia | Mohammed Tawsif Salam

It plays into a Saudi law regarding guardianship. In short, there must be one male guardian per Saudi woman. In practice, this means that women can't do anything official — apply for a passport, get married, work, etc. — without the consent of her male guardian.

The app is restrictive.

Wikipedia | Walter Callens

It makes it easy for a male guardian to stop a woman from traveling where she wants to, even sending text alerts when the woman strays too far from an approved area.

Human rights watchdogs are not impressed.

Wikimedia Commons

"It's incredibly demeaning, insulting and humiliating for the women, and downright abusive in many cases, because you're allowing men absolute control over women's movements," Rothna Begum of Human Rights Watch told NPR.

Google and Apple are on board with the app.

Wikipedia | The Pancake of Heaven!

Even though they both have vetting processes for their respective app stores, the app is still available for both. Apple CEO Tim Cook said he wasn't aware of the app, but would look into it.

There's been a real backlash.

Twitter | @RonWyden

U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) called on Apple and Google to do the right thing and remove the app from their stores. He called their actions "unconscionable" in keeping the app available.

Amnesty International also weighed in.

Wikipedia | Ardfern

In a statement to the Washington Post, they called on Google and Apple to take action, saying the app "highlights the disturbing system of discrimination against women under the guardianship system and the need for genuine human rights reforms."

Why Apple and Google?

Wikipedia | Joe Ravi

Because they're the major app platforms in the world, they can control access to apps — and, as American companies, they tend to be more receptive to backlashes that could hurt their valuation.

Why not ask the Saudis to stop?

Wikipedia | Robinson Niñal

They're an incredibly powerful country, and western appeals to clean up their human rights record have fallen on deaf ears in the past. It's extremely unlikely that they'd make any changes.

We'll have to wait and see.

Google Play Store

This news broke a week ago, and Absher is still available (not just in Saudi Arabia, either). It remains to be seen whether the backlash grows, or if this story just fades away.

What do you think?

Getty Images | FAYEZ NURELDINE

Many western countries ally themselves with Saudi Arabia for economic reasons while doing little to convince the kingdom to improve its human rights record. It's a complicated question, but what do you think is the best way to handle this kind of relationship?